askygoneonfire: Red and orange sunset over Hove (Default)
Incredibly it really is, undeniably, June. And that means I'm up to the sixth letter of my prompt word of housewarming.  Today I'm going for....

Warmth

I think of warmth - or rather use that term most often - in terms of emotional and social warmth. It's something I reflected on way back in January with my first prompt letter, and it's something I proactively look to give and cherish in return.

Warmth happens in lots of ways.

Consideration, is perhaps first. What is the small act I can undertake today to let someone feel the warmth of my regard for them? I arranged for friends in Brighton to drop off a care package of small items (which are unorderable via the internet) at the house of another friend on my behalf. That's one way to extend warmth, it flows through other people and enlivens everyone in the chain.

Articulations of warmth are easily second in importance, but I find them more challenging. After listening to me lament that I didn't know how someone felt about me, a friend posed a simple question; have you told them what you like about them? And I realised that while I felt I had shown through consideration how I felt about them, I hadn't actually labelled it. It's hard to halt conversation and say "hey you! you're great. I like these things about you; [list]". I am enjoying doing it - telling people exactly how highly I regard them and how warm I feel about it. I have also written such expressions down for another couple of people as part of my coronavirus letter-writing campaign which is easier and harder than doing it verbally: letters feel like they might be more unwelcome or sound stale? But they do have the advantage of not halting a conversation.It still makes me curl up and want to disappear when people do it to me. Funny that it's possible to shun that warmth when it's offered, even though I long for it.

Affection is going to be my third. It's a thing I find difficult to give but easier to receive in certain forms. Large demonstrations of affection in it's most normative/readily understood forms - hugging everyone in sight, being tactile with people as routine, public declaraitions of affection - are never going to be me. But careful, precise, personalised affection? That: I can give and receive freely. An arm slipped around the waist of a lover, a squeeze of a leg, snuggling under a blanket with a nibling to read a book together, playfully punching a friend on the arm for the sustained and affectionate ribbing they just gave you, a naming that calls you into being in a different way than the words other people use for you, a tone of voice and softness you only offer to or receive from certain people. These are the things that stoke a fire. 

Which brings me to...vulnerability. Perhaps the essence of warmth, and underpining all the things I've tried to label. It's also I think why warmth is something I have to practice. I hate being vulnerable (I mean, who doesn't). Vulnerability comes from letting people in: allowing people to learn that there are types of physical affection I enjoy and allowing myself to reach out, finding how to respond to articulations of warmth which necessarily includes acknowledgement I need something from someone, confronting the fear of rejection or terror of being thought inappropriate for articulating warmth, fear of exposing the fact I can't easily respond to such declarations, and talking myself into being confident enough to interrupt 'life' in favour of acts of consideration. 

Experiencing warmth is therefore sometimes dizzying in the trust it requires. And expressing warmth, showing warmth, spreading warmth, requires me to drop some part of my defences or revise the version of myself I've presented so often. Which isn't to say friends are suddenly shocked at me telling them I like them - only that I am trying to broaden the ways in which I communicate that. 

This was all precipitated near the beginning of lockdown when a friend told me he admired the way I was able to build community and the strength of care he had experienced from me. I was really taken aback by it as I had felt that he regarded me as more of an acquaintance, even though I had had a deep sense of care - and warmth - towards him which I'd tried to offer in little pieces. It made me realise it was possible to acknowledge how valuable the warmth of someone's offered friendship is, and to cement a relationship by doing so. And it made me feel that I had something to offer to people in my sometimes idiosyncratic expressions of care, affection, and love. 

So warmth is what I am cherishing, and investing in. And it's hard sometimes because it feels like exposing myself. But it does create a glow you can keep being warmed by when you manage it; it reflects back and makes the next expression easier.
askygoneonfire: Red and orange sunset over Hove (Default)
I like Stephen Fry, I really do. I liked him in that well meaning 'he's always there' sort of way for years, then I was given Moab is my Washpot for Christmas a few years ago and I liked him even more. Then there was the wonderful Secret Diary of a Manic Depressive where I felt a deep love and respect for this man. What a hero! Then I stopped watching QI because I rather lost faith in it after an offensive episode with the theme 'gender' where Stephen didn't stop a potentially offensive conversation at the usual point he does when things get out of hand. But I shrugged it off, watched a few more episodes and felt the programme/Stephen/Alan Davies had lost their edge; such is life.

This year for my birthday I was delighted to receive The Fry Chronicles. I have trudged through 150 pages of it in a flagging, fatigued sort of manner and sighed as I wade through dropped name after dropped name. Who are these people and why are you listing their names instead of telling me about how you and Kim became lovers and what that relationship meant to you?

When the story broke on twitter that Stephen Fry told Attitude magazine that he believes straight men envy the easy informality of gay sexual relationships and that they all wish there were straight cruising grounds whilst women don't enjoy sex and use it to trap men I was depressingly ready to accept the reality of that claim. Then Stephen huffed off twitter in a blaze of drama only deigning to say it was 'untrue'.

Today he wrote a 4 page rebuttal of the claims. Except he sort of didn't...

At some point we chatted about gay sexuality – well, you would wouldn’t you, for a gay magazine? – and as part of that conversation I repeated the old canard about how men, unlike women, were cursed with their uniquely pressing and annoying libidos. Straight men I have known have often (of course mostly in a kind of bitter jest) said how much they envied gay people the simplicity of their erotic lifestyles (cottaging and cruising and so on) and I vamped for a while on that theme. I do not believe it as some kind of eternal gender truth, I was simply taking a thought for a walk.

The problem here, for me, is that this is not a thought which needs or should be taken for a walk. It's a sweeping generalisation which offends 99% of the people it so neatly ties up in a bow. He didn't say, at the time, that he didn't believe it to be an eternal gender truth, he just trotted out an old stereotype (I know exactly 1 gay man who has EVER gone cottaging. ONE) because he thought it would appeal to his gay audience? There is no part of that which isn't a problem.

At a time when morale is low in the gay community (a chronic rise in homophobia, teenage suicides, gay bashing and religious intolerance) I thought it worth making the light enough point that in some ways you could see the male gay life as a lot easier than the male straight life.

The urge to respond to this merely with "oh thank god Stephen Fry is here to raise out spirits! Our noble leader!" is...overwhelming. Nonetheless, I'll delve a bit deeper. Comparisons of the 'ease' of life based purely on sexuality are problematic. If we want to talk about how society structures power then gay men will always win out on the 'short straw' game against straight men. There are piles of evidence, research and life experience to support that. Stephen Fry; rich, famous, working-in-entertainment Stephen Fry is in no position to comment on who has it 'easier'. The final problem here, as I touched on a moment ago, is that commenting that one persons life is harder or more comfortable than another's because of their sexuality, in this country, in this day and age, is a nonsense. Social, personal, health and economic factors - to name but a few - mean that one gay man's life has nothing in common with another's because, get this!, being gay doesn't give you an identity, it gives you a sexual predilection and possibly some oppression. Beyond that, it's up to you.

It is perhaps sad to think that [women] are as pathetically in the grip of a base and humiliating need to get their rocks off as men are, but if that is the case then that is the case

I think this reveals so much about the place all of this has come from.  Stephen Fry apparently views sex as man's greatest weakness and that women share it is to be regretted.  Here's the thing, as one of the many women on twitter who reacted with outrage at the suggestion that we don't enjoy sex, I'm actually more offended at the suggestion that my enjoyment of sex is a "base and humiliating" urge.  


One of the many fronts on which queer people are dismissed, hated, demonised and marginalised is because we have, throughout history, refused to apologise for wanting to have sex in the way we want to.  Society was reminded by those awful queers that sex didn't have to be functional; it could be about passion and enjoyment and 'base' desire.  The 'death drive' of non reproductive queer sex is the spectre against which many of the transformative social battles have been waged.  It's not about sex, it's about love.  I want to have children to, I just don't want heterosexual sex to do it. etc etc.  And those things are true.  But queer is, also, about sex.  And our continuing liberation is a sexual one as well as a social one.  Glorious, sensual, violent, transformative, forgettable, passionate, animal, unthinking, intellectual SEX.  And that there is any kind of unified distinction between the relationship of persons of different genders and sex is ridiculous.  That all men are 'gripped' by the need to have sex is insulting.  That women sharing that impulse devalues some vague sense of superiority Stephen Fry previously associated with women devalues only his opinions, not us.

All in all, I am saddened.
askygoneonfire: Red and orange sunset over Hove (Default)
 Dear Universe,

Thank you for introducing me to a charming, intelligent, attractive woman with whom I can frequently have in depth and heartfelt philosophical, political, ethical, moral and theological discussions.  She is exactly what I asked for.

Unfortunately I neglected to specify that she and I should be romantically compatible, which led to a ridiculously drawn out unsuccessful relationship - because we both recognised we were right for each other and ignored every single aspect of our relationship which showed we weren't - and now a friendship which, whilst fulfilling, only serves to remind me of how close, and yet how far we came to getting what we both wanted.

Next time can you do less coming-of-age-drama-learning-wishes-don't-get-you-what-you-want moralising with the wish granting sting in the tail thing and just find me a nice girl.....or maybe a boy.

Ta.



askygoneonfire: Red and orange sunset over Hove (Default)
 So, I was under the impression that all cis-women were wired up in such a way that they woke up from dreams of an erotic nature just before orgasm, however, conversation this evening has revealed that is not always the case, so I put it to you, Dreamwidth and LiveJournal; do you wake up pre or post dream orgasm, and what is your sex and/or gender identity (aka: whatever info you wish - or do not wish - to include here is fine)?

Anonymous posting is, naturally, enabled on both sites, so bombard me with responses, please, I'm fascinated by the concept.


Profile

askygoneonfire: Red and orange sunset over Hove (Default)
a sky gone on fire

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122 232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios